Arizona is not a Cinderella


There are a few phrases that I hate this time of year. The chief among them is ‘Cinderella story.’ I understand the connotation and yes, there are a few cases where teams do actually fulfill the requirements for the title. A few examples are: George Mason (2006), Princeton (1996), Gonzaga (1999). Teams that do not fit this bill include: Arizona (2009).

The Webster’s definition of a Cinderella is: one suddenly lifted from obscurity to honor or significance. I understand that in the cases above. Most people were shocked when George Mason made it into the tournament field over Hofstra, let alone reaching the Final Four. Princeton used a bunch of smart, white guys to knock of the defending national champions in UCLA and Gonzaga was a tiny Jesuit college in eastern Washington that stunningly won three games against schools from the Big 10, Pac 10 and SEC. So why doesn’t Arizona fit into that mold?

Arizona has reached the NCAA tournament 25 years in a row which is the second-longest streak ever (27 by UNC from 1975-2001). They won the national championship in 1997, were finalists in 2001 and were in the Final Four in 1994 and 1988. Just because folks were surprised when they made the tournament does not mean they are a wonderful, shocking story. Arizona defeated Utah and Cleveland State to reach the sweet sixteen, hardly a who’s who of college basketball powers.

The main reason Arizona is anointed to this position of supposed Cinderella is that this year’s tournament is proving to be even more bland than last year. In each region the top three seeds advanced with the rest being a 4-seed, 5-seed and Arizona’s 12. Had there been true ‘Cinderella’ teams (Utah State, Cleveland State) no one would be talking about Arizona at all. But the folks in sports media need something to talk about and some reason to convince their readers/viewers that this is as interesting as any other year.

So let’s cool it with the talk of how ‘special’ this Arizona team is. They appear to be pretty good but until they beat Louisville, I’m not ready to refer to them as even an interesting or surprising team.

4 Responses to Arizona is not a Cinderella

  1. Brian says:

    I completely agree they aren’t thus far… if Zona beats L’ville, then doing that and being a 12 seed and that last team in basically to the final 8 is a Cinderella team… NC State in 83 is considered a Cinderella because they beat great teams on the way to the finals and then shocked Houston in final… but NC State was a 6 seed, won a title 9 years before and had a great tradition before David Thompson’s teams… so bottom line is not yet for Arizona

  2. mao says:

    Yep, agreed. You can’t just be a Cinderella team because no one else is and there just has to be one every year. That’s annoying to me.

  3. Ryan says:

    haha, you’re right. Zona has had it pretty easy so far, Cleveland State in the 2nd round, come on, they were suppose to win.

    Interesting thing about Zona is their complete lack of depth. It’s amazing, they basically play 6 guys. Louisville plays about 9, even 10, it could get ugly.

    I will say this however, Zona does have 3 pro level players, so I wouldn’t rule anything out.

  4. […] everyone a better idea of what’s actually going on tonight. It’s like I said with the Arizona story going into the sweet 16: the media need something to cling to as a sob-story, Olympics-style […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: